CONTACT DERMATITIS

Allergic contact dermatitis to edible essential oils: A case report
Lee S, Patel K and Tate B
First case of pustular eyelid allergic contact dermatitis to methacrylates in artificial nails
Menanteau M, Bensefa-Colas L and Crepy MN
Pulpitis of the fingers, it is not always acrylates!
Raison-Peyron N, Gana ME, Svedman C and Dahlin J
A case of contact dermatitis caused by a cell phone grip ring
Ueda S, Akashi K and Washio K
Allergic contact cheilitis/stomatitis due to beverages and food, an underreported diagnosis
Kerre S and Goossens A
Allergic contact dermatitis to benzoyl peroxide mimics anaphylactic reaction
Coco-Viloin M and Giordano F
Allergic contact dermatitis triggered by castor oil-containing dressings
Delgado-Prada A, Valls-Mompo M, Ferriols Lisart F, Sastre Sastre A, Tarrasó-Castillo B, Morales-Rubio A and Morales-Rubio C
Delayed presentation of cobalt allergy to a shoulder prosthesis presenting 4 years post-implantation
Fuller J and Nixon R
Photobiomodulation suppresses allergic contact dermatitis by inhibiting T-cell activation
Fu J, Zhao R, Jiang Y, Chen Y, Du J, Liu Y and Xu J
Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is a dermal inflammatory disease caused by allergic reactions to substances that contact the skin. The hyperactivation of T cells plays an important role in its pathogenesis. Photobiomodulation (PBM) is an efficacious therapeutic approach for suppressing inflammatory diseases.
Patch test results to the Spanish baseline patch test series according to age groups: A multicentric prospective study from 2019 to 2023
Pesqué D, Planella-Fontanillas N, Borrego L, Sanz-Sánchez T, Zaragoza-Ninet V, Serra-Baldrich E, Miquel-Miquel FJ, Silvestre-Salvador JF, Córdoba-Guijarro S, Sánchez-Gilo A, Mercader-García P, Navarro-Triviño FJ, Ortiz-de-Frutos FJ, Tous-Romero F, Rodríguez-Serna M, Melé-Ninot G, Barrabés-Torrella C, Ruiz-González I, Pastor-Nieto MA, Carrascosa-Carrillo JM, Gómez-de-la-Fuente E, Sánchez-Pedreño-Guillén P, Sánchez-Pérez J, Pereyra-Rodríguez JJ, Gatica-Ortega ME, González-Pérez R, Pujol RM, Descalzo MÁG, García-Doval I and Giménez-Arnau AM
Patch test results may be influenced by age-related factors. However, there is still discordant evidence between age and patch test results.
Five cases of allergic contact dermatitis caused by Basic Blue 99 contained in hair colour treatment products
Nishioka K, Koizumi A and Takita Y
Contents of sensitising rubber accelerators in disposable rubber gloves: A Copenhagen market survey
Kursawe Larsen C, Schwensen JFB, Zachariae C, Svedman C, Johansen JD and Bergendorff O
Rubber gloves contain rubber accelerators that may cause contact allergy. The content of sensitising rubber accelerators in contemporary rubber gloves is not well known.
Outbreak of contact allergy to dicyclohexylcarbodiimide in a biotechnology laboratory
Griguola L, Cerniauskas K, Malinauskiene L, Linauskiene K, Rudyte J and Chomiciene A
Dicyclohexylcarbodiimide (DCC) is known to cause occupational allergic contact dermatitis in biotechnology laboratory workers.
Nickel-induced cheilitis related to orthodontic braces
Pintiado-Gámez M, Melé-Ninot G, Iglesias-Plaza A, Barrabés-Torrella C and Salleras-Redonnet M
Occupational protein contact dermatitis in a fitness studio employee
Pham H, Marquordt E, Schröder-Kraft C and Skudlik C
Comparison of patch testing Brazilian (Green) propolis and Chinese (poplar-type) propolis: Clinical epidemiological study using data from the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK)
Piontek K, Radonjic-Hoesli S, Grabbe J, Drewitz KP, Apfelbacher C, Wöhrl S, Simon D, Lang C and Schubert S
Propolis types differ regarding their chemical composition.
Contact dermatitis secondary to povidone-iodine: A systematic review
Kennedy H
Cutaneous reactions to povidone (PVP)-iodine are widely reported; however, distinction between allergic and irritant reactions can be challenging. Free iodine is responsible for irritant reactions and is released when PVP-iodine is in a liquid state. The aim of this study was to review the clinical presentation and results of patch testing in patients with PVP-iodine contact dermatitis. A systematic review was conducted by searching Pubmed, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar databases for reports of contact dermatitis secondary to PVP-iodine. Data were collated including study design, patient age and gender identity, iodine exposure, skin biopsy findings, and patch test methodology and results. The search revealed 187 reports with 38 eligible studies; 30 case reports/case series and 8 retrospective cohort studies. Overall, there were 223 patients with PVP-iodine contact dermatitis. The commonest reaction was irritant contact dermatitis (51%), followed by allergic contact dermatitis (40%) and contact dermatitis not further specified (9%). Irritant reactions were characterised by burn-like morphology and, when due to surgical skin disinfectant, were often distant from the surgical incision site. Patch testing was most often performed with a 10% PVP-iodine aqueous solution; however, irritant reactions in controls occur. Various testing methods including iodine in petrolatum, ethanol, dried powder, and open application testing were described. Most reactions to PVP-iodine are irritant and patch testing using a closed-chamber method yields inconsistent results due to risk of irritation from free iodine release over the 2-day occlusion time. Surgeons should be aware of the risk of prolonged skin contact with wet iodine solution.
Insights into hair dye use and self-reported adverse skin reactions in the Dutch general population: A cross-sectional questionnaire-based study
Rosenberg FM, Ofenloch RF, van der Most PJ, Snieder H and Schuttelaar MLA
Hair dyes are widely used in daily life. However, data on self-reported adverse skin reactions are scarce.
A lipidomic approach towards identifying the effects of fragrance hydroperoxides on keratinocytes
Moore AI, Moreira ASP, Guerra IMS, Goracci L, Domingues P, Melo T, Domingues MR and O'Boyle NM
Limonene and linalool are used in cosmetic products for their floral scents, but their oxidation products are strong contact allergens whose mechanisms of action are still not fully understood.
Evaluation of validity, reliability and ability to detect change for the Hand Eczema Severity Index (HECSI) and evaluation of HECSI-75 and HECSI-90 as within-patient responder definitions
Yüksel YT, Thoning H, Larsen LS, Lehmann L, Arbuckle R, Grant L and Agner T
The Hand Eczema Severity Index (HECSI) is a Clinician-Reported Outcome measure of the severity of hand eczema (HE).
Cross-reactivity between thiuram disulfides and dithiocarbamates. A study of TETD and ZDEC using mouse models
Kursawe Larsen C, Funch AB, Vaher H, Lohmann RKD, Jee MH, Schwensen JFB, Zachariae C, Svedman C, Bergendorff O, Bonefeld CM and Johansen JD
Rubber accelerators are used in the vulcanization of rubber. However, rubber accelerators for example tetraethylthiuram disulfide (TETD) and zinc diethyldithiocarbamate (ZDEC) may cause contact allergy. Concomitant reactions between ZDEC and TETD have been observed in patients which could be explained by co- or cross-reactivity.