The year 2024 celebrates the 15th anniversary of nationally organized training in and delivery of intensive short-term dynamic psychotherapy (ISTDP) in Norway. Accordingly, the authors provide an overview of the implementation of ISTDP in Norway, examine ISTDP's impact on mental health delivery, review research, reflect on practice, and discuss future directions for ISTDP in the country. Since its introduction in Norway, ISTDP has gained significant popularity and recognition in the mental health field. The training of Norwegian trainers and the founding of the Norwegian Institute for ISTDP allowed for the expansion and scalability of the ISTDP training program. Alignment of the training program with the existing framework for postgraduate specialization for psychologists and its accreditation by the Norwegian Psychological Association has ensured recognition and relevance in the mental health field. Private- and public-sector applications have further contributed to the growth and dissemination of the method in Norway. ISTDP has thus become an integral and important part of the therapeutic landscape, providing hope and healing to individuals facing various emotional challenges. ISTDP's influence is likely to keep growing, both within Norway and internationally, thus contributing to the advancement of effective psychotherapy practices worldwide.

Good psychiatric management (GPM) for borderline personality disorder is a generalist strategic case management approach used by helping professionals of different training backgrounds to work with patients with borderline personality disorder. GPM includes a flexibly administered once-weekly psychotherapy for which a brief introductory course in GPM alone is considered sufficient preparation. GPM integrates concepts from specialized evidence-based treatments for borderline personality disorder, including transference-focused psychotherapy (TFP). This article describes the TFP elements that John Gunderson acknowledged as influential to his development of GPM. A basic introduction to TFP is provided, and elements in GPM that interweave with TFP's theoretical foundation are elucidated and then illustrated in a clinical vignette that captures the GPM clinician's interventions influenced by these ideas. The vignette is then used to illustrate clinical tools informed by TFP principles and common to both GPM and TFP.

The broad acceptance of evidence-based psychosocial interventions as adjuncts to pharmacotherapy for bipolar disorder has been inhibited by the extensive training, supervision, and fidelity requirements of these approaches. Interventions that emphasize evidence-based strategies drawn from these modalities-rather than the full manualized protocols-may broaden the availability of psychotherapy for patients with bipolar disorder. In this article, psychosocial risk factors relevant to the course of bipolar disorder (stressful life events that disrupt social rhythms, lack of social support, family criticism and conflict, and lack of illness awareness or literacy) are reviewed, along with evidence-based psychosocial interventions (e.g., interpersonal and social rhythm therapy, cognitive-behavioral therapy, family-focused therapy, and group psychoeducation) to address these risk factors. The results of a component network meta-analysis of randomized psychotherapy trials in bipolar disorder are discussed. Manualized psychoeducation protocols-especially those that encourage active skill practice and mood monitoring in a family or group format-were found to be more effective, compared with individual psychoeducation or routine care, in reducing 1-year recurrence rates. Cognitive restructuring, regulation of daily and nightly routines, and communication skills training were core components associated with stabilization of depressive symptoms. The authors describe a novel psychoeducational approach-practical psychosocial management (PPM)-that integrates these core strategies into the personalized care of patients with bipolar disorder to reduce recurrences and enhance mood stability. PPM is designed to be implemented, without time-intensive training and oversight, by physician or nonphysician clinicians. Evaluating the efficacy and coverage of PPM will require implementation trials in community settings.

This study aimed to quantify the instability of psychotherapy process variables by using a novel data-analytic approach. The study explored instability of the working alliance over 10 treatment sessions and its relationship with self-esteem.

Dialectical behavior therapy for adolescents (DBT-A) is an evidence-based treatment for adolescents with multiple emotional and behavioral problems. Research has demonstrated the posttreatment acceptability of DBT-A by parents and adolescents. However, no study has systematically explored the expectations and preferences of adolescents before beginning DBT-A treatment. The goals of this study were to investigate adolescents' pretreatment expectations for DBT-A by developing the Adolescent Expectancies for Therapy Scale (AETS), adapted from the Parent Expectancies for Therapy Scale, and to explore their preferences regarding treatment delivery format.

Although integrative therapies are increasingly popular in clinical psychology, their dissemination in the psychiatric literature has been limited. To care for patients living with complex psychiatric problems, the authors formulated a flexible, pragmatic, problem-oriented integrative therapy (PIT). The aims of this article are to increase psychiatric attention to the value of integrative therapies, authorize their use, and present the authors' PIT approach. PIT combines common factors, theoretical synthesis, and technical eclecticism. After delineating patients' problems and goals, clinicians apply discrete therapeutic elements derived by unbundling numerous theories and practices. Clinicians improvise and pivot their practice in response to patients' shifting problems and goals, as well as to advances in the field. Practicing PIT requires familiarity with numerous therapeutic theories and models and a willingness to continually expand skill sets. PIT's effectiveness may be assessed by comparing results obtained with PIT with those obtained via conventional psychotherapeutic modalities.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the extent to which patients feel racially and culturally similar to their therapist, patients' perceptions of their therapist's cultural competence, and how these factors relate to the working alliance in a naturalistic treatment setting.

Considering the escalating gap between the population-level need for substance use services and the availability of board-certified addiction specialty physicians, all psychiatrists must be equipped to treat substance use disorders. Residency training programs must therefore ensure that graduates are equipped with a sufficient knowledge base and skill set to treat substance use disorders, including an understanding of medications for addiction treatment and appropriate selection and utilization of psychotherapy for substance use disorders. Resources for teaching psychiatric residents about psychotherapeutic approaches to substance use disorders are often limited, and many programs may struggle to include this content in their curricula. The authors highlight the core evidence-based psychotherapeutic approaches relevant to the care of patients with substance use disorders and identify supervised experiential learning opportunities for psychiatric residents to practice psychotherapy for substance use disorders during existing clinical rotations within their general psychiatry residency programs.

Working with dreams in the context of trauma can open unique avenues for healing, in particular for patients who report feelings of numbness or a loss of meaning in their lives. Dream exploration can make facing aspects of trauma and dissociated experience more tolerable than explicitly addressing them at a conscious level. It can also reignite the capacities for reflection and meaning making disrupted by trauma. Dreams also reconnect patients to aspects of their history that can provide context for and meaning to experiences from which they have come to feel emotionally disconnected. Finally, dreams offer a way of regaining the capacity to connect with wishes, hopes, and desires that have become difficult to access because of trauma. In this article, the authors present case examples of patients with trauma and discuss how therapists worked with dream material to unlock new possibilities for these patients' lives.

Epigenetic modifications play a pivotal role in the regulation of gene expression and cell function, offering potential markers of disease states and therapeutic outcomes. Recent advancements in neuroscience have spurred interest in studying the epigenetic underpinnings of psychosomatic medicine. This review presents a new perspective on the role of epigenetic regulation in the realms of psychosomatics and psychotherapy. The authors first highlight epigenetic patterns associated with prevalent psychosomatic disorders, including irritable bowel syndrome, fibromyalgia, psoriasis, and lichen planus. For these conditions, psychotherapy serves as a treatment modality and can be conceptualized as an epigenetic intervention that beneficially affects the epigenome as part of the therapeutic process. Focusing on cognitive-behavioral and mindfulness-based therapies, the authors highlight evidence on psychotherapy-associated epigenetic signatures occurring at genes that are involved in stress response, inflammation, neurotransmission, neuroplasticity, and aging. Educating patients about the potential of psychotherapy to affect the epigenome may enhance patient engagement with and adherence to treatment, and psychotherapy-induced epigenetic changes have the potential to promote transgenerational disease prevention, underscoring the far-reaching implications of this therapeutic approach. Challenges persist in epigenetic studies, and this review aimed to catalyze further research in this burgeoning field, with the goal of enhancing patient care.

Significant gains have been made in the treatment of personality disorder among young people. However, effect sizes for evidence-based treatments have been modest, and emerging evidence suggests the potential of generalist approaches to improve outcomes in this population. The aim of this review was to highlight how generalist approaches such as good psychiatric management for adolescents (GPM-A) hold promise for early intervention for personality disorders among young people. The authors discuss recent advances in clinical understanding of the diagnosis and treatment of personality disorder among youths and demonstrate how these advances align with GPM-A. Specifically, the authors show how several of GPM-A's guiding principles-most notably the need for access, common-factor approaches, and a focus on interpersonal hypersensitivity and restoring general functioning-align with these advances. This review suggests that GPM-A provides a timely and promising framework for innovating early interventions for personality disorder among young people.

Established trauma-focused cognitive-behavioral therapies for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) have remission rates of approximately 30%-40%. Alternatively, interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) and psychodynamic psychotherapy (PDT) focus on disrupted attachment, mentalization, and social connection in PTSD and may help some patients. The authors conducted a meta-analysis on these interpersonal and affect-oriented approaches to treating PTSD.

Patients who have experienced child abuse often have complex clinical presentations; whether a history of child abuse (HCA) affects psychotherapy outcomes is unclear. The authors examined relationships between HCA, clinical baseline variables, and change in these variables after three different psychotherapies for panic disorder (PD).

There is an inevitable limit to understanding the internal experience of patients with whom therapists work in psychotherapy. The farther their experience is from that of their therapist, the more challenging this endeavor can be. Accepting that therapists cannot exactly know a patient's internal experience invites them to explore novel ways of appreciating another person's way of perceiving relationships, deriving meaning from them, and using their experience to motivate behavior. The concept of can be used as a metaphor to help therapists imagine the internal world of their patients, as shaped by patients' developmental, interpersonal, and traumatic experiences. refers to the unique worldview created by a species' idiosyncratic perceptual organs and survival strategies. This first Psychotherapy Musings describes the concept of , applies it to the case of a patient with difficult-to-treat mental health problems, and explicates the benefit of this novel perspective.

The authors make the case for using a written instead of a spoken supervision agreement at supervision's outset in order to provide clarity and education about supervision, supply an accessible document that supervisees can readily reference, sidestep memory issues that negatively affect the supervision process, and enable dyadic collaboration that sets an immediate positive tone for supervision. The invitational, clarifying, educational, empowering, and transparent (ICEE-T) supervision agreement approach is described, with emphasis on the essential elements to put in place at the outset of supervision. A written agreement, which is valuable at any supervisee developmental stage, can be invaluable when working with novice supervisees (e.g., because of the anxieties and self-doubt of first-time supervisees) and is explored with that group foremost in mind.

This article introduces an innovative adaptation of interpersonal psychotherapy tailored to the needs of individuals identifying as gender diverse and navigating the complexities of gender transition. The few available therapeutic models designed for this population are reviewed, and the novel intervention, grounded in clinical insights and empirical research, is presented. Key components of this adaptation include expanding the interpersonal inventory with targeted processing questions and developing a disclosure timeline-a structured tool designed to guide patients through gender transition-while bolstering social support, reducing distress, and improving interpersonal effectiveness. An illustrative case vignette is included to elucidate the practical applications of this approach and to underscore essential therapeutic considerations.

Borderline personality disorder is a common condition characterized by numerous comorbid conditions, frequent use of clinical services, and an elevated lifetime risk for suicide. Good psychiatric management (GPM) was developed for patients with borderline personality disorder with the purpose of supporting wider community adoption and dissemination compared with existing therapies. The authors aimed to review the foundations and development of GPM, in particular the initial Canadian study assessing the therapy. They then reviewed the progress in research arising from the initial study and explored the research and educational opportunities needed to further the development of GPM for patients with borderline personality disorder. Research has indicated that patients with borderline personality disorder with complex comorbid conditions and impulsivity may benefit from GPM. Future research needs include noninferiority and equivalence studies comparing GPM with another evidence-based treatment; studies demonstrating that evidence-based therapies for borderline personality disorder improve functioning; and research on more accessible therapies, mechanisms of action for evidence-based therapies, extending therapies to patients with borderline personality disorder and significant comorbid conditions, and modifying therapies for men with borderline personality disorder. Attention should be directed toward testing stepped care models and integrating therapies such as GPM into psychiatric training programs. GPM is in development but shows promise as a therapy that is effective and accessible and that can be widely disseminated.

Countertransference is a basic tenet of psychodynamic theory. Although it was initially considered an unwelcome phenomenon in psychiatry, attitudes have shifted, and many mental health professionals now consider it to be a useful therapeutic tool. In this article, the author discusses countertransference as defined by the International Psychoanalytical Association's Inter-Regional Encyclopedic Dictionary of Psychoanalysis (IRED) and examines its clinical impact by using constructed vignettes of psychodynamic psychotherapies to illustrate theoretical points. As IRED delineates, countertransferences may exist at the conscious or unconscious level. In addition, the author suggests that countertransference may also exist at the preconscious level. Clinicians' examination of all levels of countertransference has the potential to be revelatory and facilitate therapeutic action, whereas unexamined countertransference can interfere with effective treatment. For this reason, self-reflection on the part of psychiatrists is essential.

Borderline personality disorder and eating disorders frequently co-occur among youths. These disorders emerge in adolescence, during the critical developmental period of building an independent sense of self and the capacity to relate to one's community. Because of core differences in the development and psychopathology of borderline personality disorder and eating disorders, adjustments are required when treating these disorders when they co-occur. Few established treatment approaches can address these disorders simultaneously. Evidence-based psychotherapies for borderline personality disorder, such as dialectical behavior therapy and mentalization-based treatment, have been adapted to accommodate the shared vulnerabilities and features of the two disorders. However, these approaches are specialized, intensive, and lengthy and are therefore poorly suited to implementation in general psychiatric or primary health care, where most frontline mental health care is provided. Generalist approaches can fill this public health gap, guiding nonspecialists in structuring informed clinical management for these impairing and sometimes fatal disorders. In this overview, the authors describe the adjustment of good (or general) psychiatric management (GPM) for adolescents with borderline personality disorder to incorporate the prevailing best practices for eating disorder treatment. The adjusted treatment relies on interventions most clinicians already use (diagnostic disclosure, psychoeducation, focusing on life outside treatment, managing patients' self-destructive behaviors, and conservative psychopharmacology with active management of comorbid conditions). Limitations of the adjusted treatment, as well as guidelines for referring patients to specialized and general medical treatments and for returning them to primary generalist psychiatric care, are discussed.

First responders face greater exposure to potentially traumatic events compared with the general public, which can lead to an increased likelihood of developing mental health concerns. The challenges of disaster relief take a physical and mental toll on first responders. Critical incident stress debriefing (CISD), the widely accepted gold-standard treatment for psychological debriefing, is often applied to offset this toll among first responders. CISD is a manualized seven-stage group intervention that was developed to provide support and aid in coping and to allow individuals who respond to emergencies and disasters to continue working. Substantial evidence has been found for its effectiveness. However, there is a general dearth of evidence about the field of prolonged disaster response, and research is hampered by the difficulties of executing a controlled study in the context of an emergency scenario.

Patients' access to their psychotherapy records may be assumed to be well protected; however, the matter is intricately regulated. In fact, the statutes and rights pertaining to patient access to psychotherapy notes vary across states. Taken together, federal and state laws indirectly and inconsistently delineate lawful access-as well as clinical exceptions to providing access-to psychotherapy notes. Federal law defers to state laws when the latter afford individuals greater access to their notes. Both federal and individual state levels vary in providing for possible conditions under which access may be restricted. Right of access to psychotherapy notes is a matter of importance for all mental health clinicians in the United States. Awareness and integration of pertinent laws and regulations allow clinicians to manage such matters without a negative impact on their clinical care. Further consideration of how clinical practice interacts with other dimensions of health care administration (clinical, ethical, and legal) may serve to enhance the integrity of a clinician's work and the ability to adapt to difficult clinical circumstances with confidence.

Demand for mental health treatment surged after the COVID-19 pandemic intensified existing issues of limited access to care and long wait times. Programs that deliver high-quality treatment in a brief format are appealing in that they could reduce wait times for care and increase the number of patients served. The Rapid-Access Focused Treatment (RAFT) program was developed with the overarching goals of delivering brief, evidence-informed interventions in a timely and patient-centered manner, reducing wait times, and improving access to psychiatric specialty services. In this article, the authors describe the pilot implementation of the RAFT program in an outpatient psychiatry clinic, provide guidelines for identification of appropriate patients, and discuss lessons learned from two case examples that illustrate variations in the trajectory of brief treatment. Recommendations for the effective implementation of brief therapy models in an outpatient setting are provided.

In this review, the question of whether good psychiatric management (GPM) has a sufficient, or good-enough, evidence base is examined from two complementary perspectives. First, the author reviews research that has investigated whether GPM reduces symptoms of borderline personality disorder. Analyses at the group and individual levels have indicated that symptoms may decrease among patients receiving GPM. Second, the author reviews research that has investigated the processes through which change occurs in GPM. Studies that have shown process changes toward emotional balance, interpersonally effective functioning, and a more coherent and reality-based autobiographical narrative are discussed. To fully answer the question of whether GPM is good enough, more controlled trials are needed to demonstrate effectiveness, mechanisms of change, and broad implementation in culturally diverse populations.

Treatment guidelines for personality disorders have typically recommended specialized psychotherapeutic interventions. In this review, the author suggests that an intervention's effectiveness may be determined less by the specific method than by therapist competence, team culture, clinical process structure, and institutional context. The author argues that these elements determine variance in effectiveness between and within methods. Whereas initial studies of a specialized treatment may reflect the exceptional competencies of the treatment's developers and early adopters, in daily clinical practice, therapists with an average level of skill may struggle with the theoretical and methodological complexities of these treatments, which can hinder genuine connection with patients. This interference may particularly affect treatment outcomes when therapists encounter the intense emotions and interpersonal hypersensitivity experienced by patients with personality disorders. Most therapists would benefit from a set of simple generalist principles that determine the context for their work and offer a framework for dealing with clinical challenges while enabling them to be true to themselves and use their previously learned competencies. The Guideline-Informed Treatment for Personality Disorders is an enhanced common-factors approach that summarizes the core principles of effective treatment and can be feasibly implemented by most therapists.