ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY

Valve-sparing versus bio-Bentall aortic root replacement in patients aged 60-75 years: Survival, Reintervention and Aortic Regurgitation
Sala A, Di Mauro M, Zancanaro E, Bargagna M, Grimaldi F, D'Oria V, Menicanti L, Alfieri O, De Bonis M and de Vincentiis C
Valve-sparing root replacement(VSRR) with the David technique is an established therapy for aortic root pathology in young patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate short and long-term outcomes between VSRR and aortic root replacement(ARR) with a biological-valved conduit in sexagenarians.
Impact of Anticoagulation Therapy after Bioprosthetic and Homograft Pulmonary Valve Replacement
Reed AK, Sleeper LA, Roy N, VanderPluym CJ, Baird CW, Emani S and Kwon MH
The effect of anticoagulation on early postoperative outcomes following pulmonary valve replacement (PVR) with bioprosthetic valves and homografts is not yet defined. We hypothesized that short-term anticoagulation would be associated with improved valve durability.
Malperfusion in Patients with Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: A Nationwide Analysis
Goel NJ, Kelly JJ, Patrick WL, Zhao Y, Bavaria JE, Ouzounian M, Estrera AL, Takayama H, Chen EP, Reece TB, Hughes GC, Roselli EE, Kim KM, Patel HJ, Bowdish ME, Sperling JS, Leshnower BG, Preventza O, Brinkman WT and Desai ND
This study describes in detail the clinical burden of malperfusion associated with acute Type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) in a large, national cohort and the effect of treatment strategy on outcomes.
Long-Term Survival Following Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
Vyas C, Wang P, Sun J, Logan R, Smith C, Guderian E, Schnell S, Argenziano M and Kurlansky P
Management guidelines for stable three-vessel coronary artery disease have become a subject of debate. We aim to provide a benchmark for the survival of patients with normal ejection fraction, stable three-vessel disease, and elective coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery.
Considerations Regarding Intervention Threshold in Neonates and Infants with Coarctation
Stephens EH
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database: 2024 Update on Outcomes and Research
Towe CW, Kuo EY, Feczko A, Kidane B, Khullar OV, Seder CW, Schipper PH, Donahue JM, David EA, Jones LA, Habib R, ElHalabi Z and Brown LM
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database (STS GTSD) remains the largest and most comprehensive audited thoracic surgical database in the world. As the STS GTSD grows to nearly 1 million cases, the pulmonary resection for cancer and esophagectomy short-term risk models have been refined to provide participants with benchmarked performance reports to facilitate quality improvement efforts. New for 2025 will be the development of long-term risk models and the online release of both short- and long-term risk calculators. A voluntary module to collect neoadjuvant targeted and immunotherapy data has been created has been accepted by participants and is rapidly accruing data. STS GTSD participant public reporting has increased 50% over the last 2 years following the application of the US News and World Report 3% transparency credit. All GTSD data analyses are now performed internally by the STS Research and Analytic Center, resulting in multiple publications through the Access & Publication, Task Force on Funded Research, and Participant User File mechanisms. Future initiatives include the incorporation of patient-reported outcomes into the STS GTSD, revision of the data collection form to incorporate variables associated with long-term outcomes, and focused efforts to increase the value of STS GTSD participation. This report delineates volume trends, recent initiatives, and the prolific research output emanating from the STS GTSD, reflecting a year of substantial progress and academic productivity.
Lobectomy verses Sublobar Resection in The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database: Importance of Patient Factors and Lymph Node Evaluation
Woodard GA, Grau-Sepulveda M, Onaitis MW, Udelsman BV, David EA, Jacobs JP, Kosinski AS, Blasberg JD and Boffa DJ
Prospective randomized trials have demonstrated noninferior survival between sublobar resection and lobectomy in healthy non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with tumors ≤2cm. However, some patient attributes are not well represented in randomized trials and uncertainty remains in the widespread applicability of randomized trial nodal dissection protocols.
Too little, too late? Extra anatomic aortic bypass for aortic coarctation in adults
Killian AC and Dabal RJ
Increased Risk of Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement After Prior Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement with Concomitant Valve Disease
Hawkins RB, Hamilton BCS, Sukul D, Deeb GM, Ailawadi G and Fukuhara S
The etiology of increased risk for reoperation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) versus prior surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) is poorly understood. This study evaluated the impact of concomitant mitral and tricuspid valve disease on associated risk of TAVR explant.
Insurance-Based Disparities in Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy Following Heart Transplantation Are Mediated by Care at High Volume Centers
Sakowitz S, Bakhtiyar SS, Mallick S, Pereira S, Nelson J, Parikh R, Higgins R, Shemin R and Benharash P
Socioeconomic disadvantage and Medicaid insurance have been linked with inferior survival following heart transplantation, yet the contributing mechanisms remain to be elucidated. We evaluated the association of Medicaid with the development of cardiac allograft vasculopathy(CAV).
Redo Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement versus Valve-in-Valve Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Degenerated Bioprosthetic Valves
Awtry J, Vinholo TF, Cho M, Allen P, Semco R, Hirji S, McGurk S, Newell P, Dey T, Cunningham MJ, Sabe A and Cruz K
Valve-in-valve transcatheter aortic valve replacement (ViV-TAVR) is associated with improved perioperative safety compared to redo surgical aortic valve replacement (redo-SAVR), but long-term outcomes remain uncertain. We therefore compare long-term outcomes of ViV-TAVR and redo-SAVR.
Volume-Outcome Relationship of Norwood Procedures: Insights from the National Pediatric Cardiology - Quality Improvement Collaborative Database
Schäfer M, McFarland C, Amula V, Truong D, Lambert LM, Griffiths ER, Eckhauser AW, Husain SA and Hobbs RD
Prior investigations of the center-specific case volume on outcomes in hypoplastic left heart syndrome have conflicting results. This study utilized the National Pediatric Cardiology Quality Improvement Collaborative (NPC-QIC) registry to investigate the center volume-outcome relationship in patients following the Norwood procedure with consideration of pre-operative high-risk features.
Assessing Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility of Lung Cancer Patients in the Boston Lung Cancer Study: An Analysis of 7,186 Lung Cancer Cases
Potter AL, Guo Q, Srinivasan D, Yang ME, McCarthy M, Wang D, Kothari J, Shafer A, Christiani DC and Jeffrey Yang CF
To evaluate the proportion of lung cancer patients who would have qualified for lung cancer screening under different eligibility criteria in the Boston Lung Cancer Study (BLCS).
Eighth Annual Society of Thoracic Surgeons Pedimacs Report
Griffiths ER, Profsky MP, Mokshagundam D, Boucek K, Amdani S, Davies RR, Monge MC, Morales DL, Rossano JW, Jacobs JP, Kirklin JK, Koehl D, Cantor R, Peng DM and
The Pediatric Interagency Registry for Mechanical Circulatory Support (Pedimacs), supported by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons, provides detailed information on pediatric patients supported with ventricular assist devices (VADs).
Anastomotic Leak after Esophagectomy - Analysis of the STS General Thoracic Surgery Database
Axtell AL, Angeles C, McCarthy DP, Maloney JD, Leverson GE and DeCamp MM
Anastomotic leak after esophagectomy is a major cause of morbidity and mortality. We sought to identify the prevalence of anastomotic leak, stratified by operative approach and disease etiology, as well as risk factors for leak.
Multisociety Endorsement of the 2024 European Guideline Recommendations on Coronary Revascularization
Dayan V, Sabik JF, Ono M, Ruel M, Wan S, Svensson LG, Girardi LN, Woo YJ, Badhwar V, Moon MR, Szeto WY, Thourani VH, Almeida RMS, Zheng Z, Gomes WJ, Hui DS, Kelly RF, Uva MS, Chikwe J and Bakaeen FG
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Intermacs Database Risk Model for Durable Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation
Pagani FD, Singletary B, Cantor R, Mehaffey JH, Nayak A, Teuteberg J, Shah P, Cowger J, Vega JD, Goldstein D, Kurlansky PA, Stehlik J, Jacobs J, Shahian D, Habib R, Dardas TF and Kirklin JK
Statistical risk models for durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation inform candidate selection, quality improvement, and evaluation of provider performance. We developed a 90-day mortality risk model utilizing The Society of Thoracic Surgeons National Intermacs Database (STS Intermacs).
A Tale of Two Cohorts: Differences in PARTNER 3 Populations
Wolfe SB and Mehaffey JH
Transcatheter vs Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Medicare Beneficiaries with Aortic Stenosis and Coronary Artery Disease
Jagadeesan V, Mehaffey JH, Kawsara MA, Chauhan D, Hayanga JWA, Mascio CE, Rankin JS, Daggubati R and Badhwar V
As percutaneous therapeutic options expand, the optimal management of severe aortic stenosis (AS) and concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD) is being questioned between coronary artery bypass grafting and surgical aortic valve replacement (CABG+SAVR) versus percutaneous coronary intervention and transcatheter aortic valve replacement (PCI+TAVR). We sought to compare perioperative and longitudinal risk-adjusted outcomes between patients undergoing CABG+SAVR versus PCI+TAVR.
Refining Conduit Choices in CABG: Insights and Challenges from the CORONARY Analysis
Leivaditis V, Dahm M and Baikoussis NG
Bioprosthetic valve fracture for transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve replacement: A systematic literature review
Chopko TC, Afoke JN, Khan FW and Rowse PG
Transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve replacement presents a viable, minimally invasive approach to replacing degraded bioprosthetic surgical valves. The major drawback of this technique is poor hemodynamics in the form of patient-prosthesis mismatch and high transvalvular gradients. This is commonly attributable to the reduced valvular diameter from the transcatheter heart valve fixed inside the degraded bioprosthesis. Maximizing this diameter via bioprosthetic valve fracture occurs through a noncompliant, high-pressure balloon to splay the degraded valve outward. Despite its novelty, this has demonstrated improved hemodynamic outcomes and optimal valvular expansion with slightly increased operative risk. In this review, we highlight the technique of bioprosthetic valve fracture, types of suitable balloons and valves, timing in relation to valve-in-valve implantation, safety and efficacy, implications, and future directions.